{"id":22800,"date":"2016-10-03T17:42:31","date_gmt":"2016-10-03T14:42:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=22800"},"modified":"2019-01-28T22:06:48","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T19:06:48","slug":"rize-idare-mahkemesinden-cerattepe-ced-olumlu-raporunun-iptal-talebine-ret","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/rize-idare-mahkemesinden-cerattepe-ced-olumlu-raporunun-iptal-talebine-ret\/","title":{"rendered":"Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nden Cerattepe \u00c7ED olumlu raporunun iptal talebine ret"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Cerattepe\u2019de yap\u0131lmak istenen madenin \u00c7ED olumlu raporu hakk\u0131nda Artvin halk\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00c7ED iptal davas\u0131nda Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi talebin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verdi<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-20238\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2.jpg\" alt=\"cerattepe_b_2\" width=\"671\" height=\"379\" srcset=\"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2.jpg 620w, https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2-150x85.jpg 150w, https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/cerattepe_b_2-354x200.jpg 354w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 671px) 100vw, 671px\" \/><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Artvin Cerattepe\u2019de AKP taraf\u0131ndan hileyle Cengiz Holding\u2019e verilen ve Artvin\u2019i yok edecek olan maden projesi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davada karar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin en geni\u015f kat\u0131l\u0131ml\u0131 \u00e7evre ve do\u011fa davas\u0131 olan ve Cerattepe \u00c7ED olumlu raporunun iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi talebin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verdi.<\/p>\n<p>Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde 19 Eyl\u00fcl\u2019de g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada Artvin halk\u0131n\u0131n avukatlar\u0131, 4 saatlik bir savunman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan mahkeme heyetinin ve ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tarafs\u0131zl\u0131k ilkesini ihlal etti\u011fini savunarak adil yarg\u0131lama ko\u015fullar\u0131 kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f ve reddi hakim talep ederek duru\u015fma salonunu terk etmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n<p>Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi kendisine yap\u0131lan reddi hakim talebini iki g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde de\u011ferlendirerek reddetmi\u015f ancak us\u00fclen g\u00f6ndermesi gereken Samsun \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6ndermemi\u015fti. Reddi hakim talebine dair s\u00fcreci us\u00fcl\u00fcne uygun bir \u015fekilde i\u015fletmeyen Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, \u201c\u00c7evresel Etki De\u011ferlendirme (\u00c7ED) Olumlu\u201d raporunun y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 ve iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada karar vererek talebi reddetti.<\/p>\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan 45 sayfal\u0131k kararda, bilirki\u015fi raporundaki de\u011ferlendirmelere dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, \u201cDevlet ormanlar\u0131nda gerekli iznin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ile madencilik faaliyetlerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu ve dava konusu madencilik projesi i\u00e7in gerekli izinlerin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d vurgulanarak, \u201cProjenin devlet orman\u0131 olan alanda yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d belirtildi.<\/p>\n<p>Verilen kararda, yap\u0131lan itirazlara ili\u015fkin olarak \u015fu de\u011ferlendirmeler yap\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMadencilik Faaliyetleri \u0130zin Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re milli park alan\u0131 ile k\u00fclt\u00fcr ve turizm koruma ve geli\u015fim b\u00f6lgeleri ile turizm merkezlerinin bulundu\u011fu alanlarda dahi gerekli izinler al\u0131nmak kayd\u0131yla madencilik faaliyetlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn iken, fava konusu madencilik projesinin milli park alan\u0131nda yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, milli park alan\u0131na 660 metre uzakl\u0131kta oldu\u011fu, turizm koruma ve geli\u015fim b\u00f6lgesi ile turizm merkezinin ise kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil, yan\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ,dava konusu projenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 alan\u0131n mevzuat a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yasakl\u0131 alanlar i\u00e7erisinde yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da sabittir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Sendika.Org\u2019a konu\u015fan Ye\u015fil Artvin Derne\u011fi Y\u00f6netim Kurulu \u00dcyesi ve Avukat\u0131 Bedrettin Kal\u0131n ile Ye\u015fil Artvin Derne\u011fi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Nur Ne\u015fe Karahan karar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi, hukuki s\u00fcrecin nas\u0131l devam edece\u011fini aktard\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Us\u00fclden de esastan da kusurlu<\/strong><br \/>\nKal\u0131n, karar\u0131n kendilerine hen\u00fcz tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fini ancak tebli\u011f edilir edilmez us\u00fclden de esastan da temyize gideceklerini belirtti. Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin reddi hakim talebini Samsun\u2019a g\u00f6ndermeyerek us\u00fclen kusurlu oldu\u011funu belirten Kal\u0131n, karara dair de esasa itiraz ederek temyize gideceklerini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cArt\u0131k yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkemeler yap\u0131yor\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\n\u201cHukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7 hen\u00fcz tamamlanmad\u0131\u201d diyen Karahan da karar\u0131 temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcreceklerini hat\u0131rlatt\u0131. Verdikleri m\u00fccadelenin ya\u015famsal bir m\u00fccadele oldu\u011funun alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izen Karahan, bug\u00fcne kadar yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir\u015fey yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirtti, Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin us\u00fcls\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin \u201cMaalesef bug\u00fcn yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkemeler yap\u0131yor\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Kaynak: Sendika.Org<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Cerattepe\u2019de yap\u0131lmak istenen madenin \u00c7ED olumlu raporu hakk\u0131nda Artvin halk\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00c7ED&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4703],"tags":[1792,1803,1793],"class_list":{"0":"post-22800","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-kent-ve-doga","8":"tag-artvin","9":"tag-artvin-cerattepe","10":"tag-cerattepe"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22800\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}