{"id":26024,"date":"2017-07-13T15:31:30","date_gmt":"2017-07-13T12:31:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=26024"},"modified":"2019-01-28T22:10:35","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T19:10:35","slug":"meslek-odalari-kamusal-alanlarimizi-haramilere-teslim-etmeyecegiz-adalet-istiyoruz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/meslek-odalari-kamusal-alanlarimizi-haramilere-teslim-etmeyecegiz-adalet-istiyoruz\/","title":{"rendered":"Meslek odalar\u0131: &#8220;Kamusal alanlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 haramilere teslim etmeyece\u011fiz, adalet istiyoruz&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, Ziraat M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131, Peyzaj Mimarlar\u0131 Odas\u0131 ve \u00c7evre M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, AO\u00c7\u2019nin Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi ile ranta ve talana a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan red edilmesi odalar taraf\u0131ndan tepkiyle kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131. Odalar, \u201cAdalet istiyoruz, Bu karar yarg\u0131n\u0131n siyasalla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesidir. Ama\u00e7 G\u00f6k\u00e7ek\u2019i yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131rmak. Kamusal alanlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 haramilere teslim etmeyece\u011fiz&#8221; dedi.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/ankara_aocaciklama_2017.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"525\" height=\"280\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/ankara_aocaciklama_2017.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-26025\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ankara 18 \u0130dare Mahkemesi Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, Ziraat M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131, Peyzaj Mimarlar\u0131 Odas\u0131 ve \u00c7evre M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle AO\u00c7 arazisi i\u00e7indeki Ankapark\u2019a ili\u015fkin 1\/10000 Koruma Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131 ve 1\/1000 Koruma Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Uygulama \u0130mar Plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin iptali i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davay\u0131 ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddetti.<\/p>\n<p>TMMOB Ankara \u0130l Koordinasyon Kurulu, Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, Ziraat M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131, Peyzaj Mimarlar\u0131 Odas\u0131 ve \u00c7evre M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131, Ankapark\u2019taki adaletsizlik s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131 yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131n\u0131n siyasalla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesidir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Tezcan Karaku\u015f Candan, ise \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu:<\/p>\n<p>\u201c5 oda ile birlikte AO\u00c7 i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z bir\u00e7ok davadan bir tanesiydi Ankapark Koruma Ama\u00e7l\u0131 \u0130mar Plan\u0131 davas\u0131.  2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda yenileme alan\u0131 ilan edilen Hayvanat Bah\u00e7esi Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019dan iptal edildikten sonra bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te yap\u0131lan 1\/10.000 Koruma Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131na ve 1\/1000 Koruma Ama\u00e7l\u0131 Uygulama \u0130mar Plan\u0131na a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z davalar\u0131n sonucu \u015fekillenmi\u015f oldu. Bu karar hukuksuzlu\u011fun ve yarg\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l siyasalla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir g\u00f6stergesidir. \u00d6ncelikle Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne 5 oda ba\u015fkan\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z ve bununla ilgili verilen karar\u0131n, kurumsal olarak meslek odalar\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi uygulanmas\u0131 hukuksuzdur. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru ile  kurumsal davay\u0131 ay\u0131rt edemeyecek kadar okumu\u015f cehaletle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131yay\u0131z. \u2026Onun da  \u00f6tesinde Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 da A\u0130HM\u2019e ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131k. A\u0130HM\u2019de ba\u015fvuruyu ilk filitrasyondan ge\u00e7irip davay\u0131 g\u00f6rmeye ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin o d\u00f6nemde verdi\u011fi karar menfaatimizin olmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeydi. AYM karar\u0131na g\u00f6re ma\u011fdur olabilmemiz i\u00e7in AO\u00c7 de kesilen a\u011fa\u00e7 olmam\u0131z gerekiyor. Oysa bizim AO\u00c7 de ki ma\u011fduriyetimiz, sadece meslek odalar\u0131 ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fil, bir \u00fclke tarihi bir ulusal bellek alan\u0131 ve cumhuriyetin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc de\u011ferlerinin kurucu mekan\u0131n talan edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetidir. Hepimiz ma\u011fduruz.  <\/p>\n<p><strong>Ama\u00e7 G\u00f6k\u00e7ek\u2019i yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131rmak<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Candan, sadece meslek odalar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fil, Cumhuriyet ideolojisinin, kamusall\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, toplumcu bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, laikli\u011fin, teknoloji ve bilime verdi\u011fi \u00f6nemin ma\u011fdur edildi\u011fini belirterek, \u015funlar\u0131 kaydetti:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 davac\u0131 odalar\u0131n lehine olmu\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, mahkeme s\u00fcrekli bilirki\u015fi raporunda belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen deyip kendisini bilim ve tekni\u011fin yerine koyan bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla talan\u0131 me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f.  Mahkeme bilimi ve tekni\u011fi devre d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kararlarda Ankara\u2019n\u0131n 1\/100.000 \u00c7evre D\u00fczeni Plan\u0131na at\u0131fta bulunarak olay\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi zamanda 4 y\u0131l sonra onaylanan palan g\u00f6nderme yaparak hukuku katletmi\u015ftir. Hukuk ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopart\u0131larak y\u0131llar sonra yap\u0131lacak planlara g\u00f6re karar veremez. Bu karar hukukun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, siyasala\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve Ankapark\u2019\u0131n yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7evre D\u00fczeni plan\u0131n\u0131n 2017\u2019de onayland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fczde bizim davam\u0131z 2013\u2019teki bir hukuksuzlukla ilgili. As\u0131l hedef AO\u00c7\u2019nin ve kamusal alan\u0131n talan edilmesi, pe\u015fke\u015f \u00e7ekilmesi ile ilgili m\u00fccadele veren odalar\u0131 devre d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rakmak.  Ankapark\u2019ta 30\u2019u ya\u015fk\u0131n ihale yap\u0131ld\u0131 ve bu ihalelerde kamusal varl\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z bir oyuncak tarlas\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi\u2019nde Ankapark ile ilgili ihalelerde s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin oldu\u011funu biliyoruz.  Ankapark i\u00e7in harcanan maliyet 3 milyar liray\u0131 a\u015facak ve hesap vermek istemedikleri i\u00e7in yarg\u0131ya m\u00fcdahale ediyorlar.  Maliyetleri sorgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi hesap vermiyor. Ankapark s\u00fcrecinin yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131rmak ve \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fc kapatmak istiyorlar. Bu nedenle esastan reddediyorlar, zaten ehliyetten bir\u00e7ok kez denediler ve \u00fcst kurullardan geri d\u00f6nd\u00fc. Ama\u00e7lar\u0131 s\u00fcreci uzatarak talan\u0131 zaman yaymak. Mahkeme bu talan karar\u0131nda 5659 say\u0131l\u0131 AO\u00c7 kanuna referans bile g\u00f6stermeden tar\u0131m alan\u0131 olan bir yerde ticari yap\u0131la\u015fma yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z ard\u0131 ederek karar vermi\u015ftir.  Tamamen Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Melih G\u00f6k\u00e7ek\u2019i ve onun uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131rmak isteniyor. \u00dcst kurula ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131z. AO\u00c7 m\u00fccadelesi devam edecek,  G\u00f6k\u00e7ek\u2019in yarg\u0131dan ka\u00e7\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ankapark ihaleleri, Ka\u00e7ak Saray m\u00fccadelesi gibi bir bir a\u00e7\u0131klanacak\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Candan, \u00f6te yandan 2013\u2019teki bir olay\u0131n 2017deki planla ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131p, davada gerek\u00e7e olarak g\u00f6sterilmesine ili\u015fkin ise \u015fu de\u011ferlendirmeyi yapt\u0131:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBu hukuksuzluk s\u00fcreci ileriye d\u00f6n\u00fck bir plan karar\u0131 \u00fczerinden geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck plan\u0131  yarg\u0131l\u0131yorsa, be\u015f oda ba\u015fkan\u0131 i\u00e7in G\u00f6k\u00e7ek taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada  bu karara g\u00f6re iftira olarak yarg\u0131lanacak bir s\u00fcrecin \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131yor. Adaletsizlik bu i\u015fte.  Bu sadece Ankapark\u2019\u0131n yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecinden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 de\u011fil 5 oda ba\u015fkan\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131lan iftira davas\u0131n\u0131n da altl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olacak hukuksuz bir karar.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir\u2019in kaybetti\u011fi davalar\u0131 me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Emre Sevim, ise tepkisini \u015f\u00f6yle dile getirdi:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSon bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde AKP 15 Temmuz\u2019dan yararlanarak yarg\u0131y\u0131 ele ge\u00e7irdi. Davalar kaybetmeye bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 aleyhimize gelmeye ba\u015flad\u0131.  Art\u0131k yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131 ele\u015ftirmiyoruz, yarg\u0131l\u0131yoruz. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc art\u0131k bir yarg\u0131 merci yok art\u0131k kamuoyunun vicdan\u0131na sunuyoruz. Karar ba\u015ftan sona sa\u00e7ma, bilirki\u015fi raporu lehimize olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu mahkemenin aleyhimize iki kararda da kopyala yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Anayasa Mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z 5 oda temsilcisi olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurumuzda idare mahkemesi sizin ba\u015fvurulara Anayasa mahkemesi ki\u015fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yetersizlik vermi\u015ftir. Bunu dayanak kabul ediyorum diyor. \u00c7ok korkun\u00e7 bir \u015fey bir hukuk\u00e7u ger\u00e7ek ve t\u00fczel ki\u015fiyi ay\u0131rt edememektedir.  2013 teki palan a\u00e7m\u0131\u015fsan\u0131z dava 2017\u2019deki ask\u0131ya \u00e7\u0131kacak plan\u0131 tahmin etseydiniz de ke\u015fke buna uyundur diye karar \u00fcretseydiniz diyor bu da \u00e7ok korkun\u00e7. Davam\u0131z sonra bu plan ask\u0131ya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f, bu kara e\u011fer ki idari mahkemeler taraf\u0131ndan kabul g\u00f6r\u00fcrse b\u00fct\u00fcn davalar\u0131m\u0131z \u00e7\u00f6ker \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u00e7evre d\u00fczeni plan\u0131 Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi\u2019ni kaybetti\u011fi davalar\u0131 me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve hukuksuzdur. Bu karar idari mahkemeleri taraf\u0131ndan kabul g\u00f6r\u00fcrse Ankaram\u0131za ge\u00e7mi\u015f olsun\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Peyzaj Mimarlar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ay\u015feg\u00fcl Oru\u00e7kaptan, ehliyetimizin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, menfaatimizin ma\u011fdur olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma talebimiz, dava talebimiz reddedildi. Emirler art\u0131k saraydan al\u0131n\u0131yor bu siyasi bir karard\u0131r o nedenle bundan sonraki a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z davalar\u0131n b \u015fekilde sonu\u00e7lanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. Bu karar\u0131 reddediyoruz \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n<p>Toplant\u0131ya TMMOB \u0130KK Sekreteri \u00d6zg\u00fcr Top\u00e7u, Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Tezcan Karaku\u015f Candan, \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Emre Sevim, Peyzaj Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ay\u015feg\u00fcl Oru\u00e7kaptan kat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Anayasa hi\u00e7e say\u0131l\u0131yor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Odalar ad\u0131na ortak bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapan TMMOB \u0130KK Sekreteri \u00d6zg\u00fcr Top\u00e7u, \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAO\u00c7\u2019nin Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi ile ranta ve talana a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 davay\u0131 Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesi konu \u00fczerinde birli\u011fimizin menfaati olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek reddetti. Bu kararla g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor ki, yarg\u0131 tamamen AKP iktidar\u0131n\u0131n kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131na girmi\u015ftir. Bu durum demokrasi ve hukukun yoklu\u011funa hukukun otoriter ve keyfi kullan\u0131m\u0131na yol a\u00e7maktad\u0131r. Gelinen s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00fclkeyi y\u00f6netenler OHAL\u2019in grevleri engellemenin bir arac\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dahi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a itiraf etmektedir. \u00d6zelde Ankara 18. \u0130dare mahkemesi genelde \u00fclkemizin hukuk sistemi anayasay\u0131 hi\u00e7e saymaktad\u0131r. Hukukun fiilen ask\u0131ya al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 adaletin i\u015flemez hale getirildi\u011fi bug\u00fcnlerde mahkemenin verdi\u011fi bu kararla AKP iktidar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 mekanizmalar\u0131n\u0131 ne derece etkiledi\u011fi bir kez daha g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Kamu yarar\u0131 alg\u0131s\u0131nda zerre nasiplenmemi\u015f oyan B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 s\u00f6ylemleriyle yarg\u0131daki de\u011fi\u015fimi g\u00f6zemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bizler kentimizi tarihimi, de\u011ferlerimizi ki\u015fisel rantlar\u0131 u\u011fruna kamusal alanlar\u0131 parsel parsel pe\u015fke\u015f \u00e7ekenlere kar\u015f\u0131 halk\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n do\u011fan\u0131n eme\u011fimizin yan\u0131nda saf tutmaktan ne pahas\u0131na olursa olsun vazge\u00e7meyece\u011fiz sokaklar\u0131n\u0131z\u0131 ve meydanlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 ya\u015fam alanlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 ge\u00e7mi\u015f ku\u015faklardan teslim ald\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z kamusal alanlar\u0131 eme\u011fimizle b\u00fct\u00fcnle\u015fen do\u011fam\u0131z\u0131 bir avu\u00e7 haramiye teslim etmeyece\u011fiz.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Kaynak: Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi, Ziraat M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4703],"tags":[3505,1777,1685,2633,180],"class_list":{"0":"post-26024","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-kent-ve-doga","8":"tag-ankapark","9":"tag-ankara-buyuksehir-belediyesi","10":"tag-aoc","11":"tag-aoc-imar-planlari","12":"tag-melih-gokcek"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}