{"id":3417,"date":"2011-10-05T14:54:48","date_gmt":"2011-10-05T11:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=3417"},"modified":"2011-10-05T14:54:48","modified_gmt":"2011-10-05T11:54:48","slug":"herkes-heslere-dava-acabilir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/herkes-heslere-dava-acabilir\/","title":{"rendered":"Herkes HES&#8217;lere Dava A\u00e7abilir"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><strong>&#8216;\u00c7ED Olumlu&#8217; ve &#8216;\u00c7ED gerekli de\u011fildir&#8217; kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunarak iptal edilmesiyle birlikte &#8216;Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmalar\u0131&#8217; da, s\u00f6zle\u015fme nedeni ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyor\u2026\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div> <\/div>\n<div>\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, Rize\u2019nin F\u0131nd\u0131kl\u0131 il\u00e7esi \u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi \u00fczerinde Ayen Enerji \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan kurulmas\u0131 planlanan Pa\u015falar Reg\u00fclat\u00f6r\u00fc ve HES projesi i\u00e7in DS\u0130 ile imzalanan \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131 iptal etti. Mahkeme daha \u00f6nce davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015f, Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n \u2018Ret Karar\u0131n\u0131\u2019 temyiz ederek bozmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararda, \u2018\u00c7ED Olumlu Karar\u0131\u2019 iptal edilen HES projesinin \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n da hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, d\u00f6nemin Trabzon K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan, k\u00f6yl\u00fclerin ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Do\u011fal S\u0130T Alan\u0131 ilan edilen F\u0131nd\u0131kl\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi \u00fczerinde Ayen Enerji \u015firketi taraf\u0131ndan kurulmas\u0131 planlanan 40 megavat kurulu g\u00fcc\u00fcndeki Pa\u015falar Reg\u00fclat\u00f6r\u00fc ve HES projesinin \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Dava \u00f6nce reddedildi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>DS\u0130 ile Ayen Enerji \u015firketi aras\u0131nda imzalanan \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iptali amac\u0131yla DS\u0130 aleyhine Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde 2008\u2019de a\u00e7\u0131lan davada Mahkeme, 13.03.2008 tarihinde, davay\u0131 a\u00e7an H.S\u0131tk\u0131 \u00d6zkazan\u00e7\u2019\u0131n, \u2018ki\u015fisel, g\u00fcncel ve me\u015fru bir menfaatinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek, \u2018ehliyetsizlik\u2019 nedeniyle Dan\u0131\u015ftay yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere reddetti.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019dan bozma karar\u0131\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Mahkemenin ret karar\u0131 \u00fczerine, temyiz ba\u015fvurusunu kabul eden Dan\u0131\u015ftay 13. Dairesi, Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n bozma karar\u0131nda, \u201c\u00c7evre, tarih ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel de\u011ferlerin korunmas\u0131 ve imar uygulamalar\u0131 gibi kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 yak\u0131ndan ilgilendiren konular\u0131n daha geni\u015f yorumlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi Dan\u0131\u015ftay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131yla kabul edilmi\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n vatanda\u015f s\u0131fat\u0131 ve i\u015flemin hukuki niteli\u011fi beraber de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde dava konusu i\u015flemle me\u015fru ve g\u00fcncel bir menfaat ilgisinin oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 dava a\u00e7ma ehliyetinin bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davay\u0131 ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddeden \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda hukuka uyarl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir\u201d denildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u00c7ED raporunu iptal etti\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde F\u0131nd\u0131kl\u0131 Derelerini Koruma Platformu \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde \u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi \u00fczerindeki k\u00f6yl\u00fcler taraf\u0131ndan Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde, d\u00f6nemin \u00c7evre ve Orman Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan Pa\u015falar Reg\u00fclat\u00f6r\u00fc ve HES projesi i\u00e7in verilen \u2018\u00c7ED Olumlu\u2019 Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi, verdi\u011fi \u2018y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma\u2019 karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 30.06.2010 tarihinde ise Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n verdi\u011fi \u00c7ED Olumlu Karar\u0131n\u0131, \u2018hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu\u2019 gerek\u00e7esi ile iptal etti.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>\u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi 1. Derecede Do\u011fal S\u0130T alan\u0131\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>\u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi, y\u00f6re halk\u0131 ve k\u00f6yl\u00fclerin Ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Trabzon K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan 06.06.2008 tarih ve 1606 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 1. Derecede Do\u011fal S\u0130T Alan\u0131 ilan edildi. HES yap\u0131mc\u0131 firmas\u0131 Ayen Enerji, S\u0130T karar\u0131na itiraz ederek \u2018iptal\u2019 istemiyle Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesinde dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Mahkeme, 30.04.2010 tarihli karar\u0131 ile \u2018iptal\u2019 ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti. Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a yap\u0131lan temyiz ba\u015fvurusu da Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan Mart 2011\u2019de reddedilerek, Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131 onand\u0131 ve \u00c7a\u011flayan Vadisi S\u0130T Alan\u0131 olarak kald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n bozma karar\u0131ndan sonra gelen iptal\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n karar\u0131 \u00fczerine davay\u0131 yeniden inceleyen Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, bu kez Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n bozma gerek\u00e7esinin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, Pa\u015falar Reg\u00fclat\u00f6r\u00fc ve HES projesi i\u00e7in Bakanl\u0131k\u00e7a verilen \u2018\u00c7ED Olumlu\u2019 Karar\u0131n\u0131n Rize \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan iptal edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek; \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019 sebebinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, \u2018dayana\u011f\u0131 kalmayan dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemektedir\u2019 ifadeleriyle DS\u0130 ile Ayen Enerji \u015firketi aras\u0131nda imzalanan \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n Dan\u0131\u015ftay yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere iptal edilmesine h\u00fckmetti.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Yeni hukuksuzluklar\u0131n g\u00f6stergesi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Derelerin Karde\u015fli\u011fi Platformu Y\u00fcr\u00fctme Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet G\u00fcrkan, bu kararla birlikte HES projelerine kar\u015f\u0131 yeni bir hukuksal d\u00f6nem daha ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n, do\u011fal ya\u015fam alanlar\u0131na geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcms\u00fcz zararlar verdi\u011fi yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ve bilimsel raporlarla ortaya konan HES projelerindeki hukuksuzluklar\u0131n bir ba\u015fka g\u00f6stergesi oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7eken G\u00fcrkan, \u201c\u00c7ED Olumlu Kararlar\u0131 ile \u00c7ED Gerekli De\u011fildir Kararlar\u0131 iptal edilen b\u00fct\u00fcn HES projelerindeki Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmalar\u0131 da iptal edilmelidir. Bu karar, HES\u2019lerdeki hukuksuzluklar\u0131n bir ba\u015fka ifadesidir\u201d dedi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>HES\u2019lere kar\u015f\u0131 herkes dava a\u00e7abilir\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>G\u00fcrkan ayr\u0131ca, Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n, i\u00e7tihatlara dayanarak vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu karar\u0131n da HES\u2019lere kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen hukuksal m\u00fccadelenin \u00f6nemli bir dayana\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funa i\u015faret ederek; \u201cAnkara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin davay\u0131 reddetme gerek\u00e7eleri, s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen hukuk m\u00fccadelesinde \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fcze konmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7evresine, topra\u011f\u0131na, suyuna, do\u011fal ya\u015fam alanlar\u0131na duyarl\u0131, ya\u015fama sahip \u00e7\u0131kan her yurtta\u015f bu konuda davac\u0131 ve taraf olabilir. Anayasal hak ve sorumluluklar gere\u011fi her yurtta\u015f\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir hakk\u0131 ve sorumlulu\u011fu bulunmaktad\u0131r. Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131 bu bak\u0131mdan \u00f6nemlidir. Mahkemeler, \u2018ihlal edilen ki\u015fisel ve me\u015fru bir menfaati bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ehliyetsizlik\u2019 gerek\u00e7eleriyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar veremeyecektir. \u0130ktidar\u0131n, bu y\u00f6nde de hukuksal d\u00fczenlemeler yapa \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011funu biliyoruz. Ancak, sadece hukuka de\u011fil, yasa ve y\u00f6netmeliklere, mevzuata ve \u00f6zellikle de bilime ve ak\u0131la ayk\u0131r\u0131 bu projelerin hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde kabul edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Hukuk m\u00fccadelesinin \u00f6n\u00fc kesilmek isteniyor\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Daha \u00f6nce de Ordu \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nin, Fatsa\u2019daki Bolaman Deresi \u00fczerinde kurulmas\u0131 planlanan Atilla 1-2 Reg\u00fclat\u00f6rleri ve HES projesi i\u00e7in verilen \u2018\u00c7ED Gerekli De\u011fildir\u2019 Karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, bu \u015fekilde bir karar verdi\u011fini an\u0131msatan G\u00fcrkan, \u201cDolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ordu \u0130dare Mahkemesi, Dan\u0131\u015ftay ve Anayasa Mahkemesinin yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir karar vermi\u015fti. Mahkeme, \u2018davac\u0131lar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n HES yap\u0131lacak y\u00f6rede ikamet etmedi\u011fi ve o y\u00f6re n\u00fcfusuna kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, s\u00f6z konusu HES projesi i\u00e7in g\u00fcncel ve me\u015fru bir menfaatinin ihlal edildi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, bu nedenle bak\u0131lan davay\u0131 a\u00e7ma ehliyetinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019 gerek\u00e7esi ile davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015fti. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, Pa\u015falar HES hakk\u0131ndaki s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir. Emsal ve ders niteli\u011finde bir karard\u0131r. Bu durum, Bakan Ero\u011flu\u2019nun, \u2018Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcm ve durumu anlatt\u0131m. HES&#8217;le hi\u00e7 alakas\u0131 olmayan ki\u015filer de bir HES i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7abiliyor. Bu konuda hukuki d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekiyor\u2019 \u015feklindeki ifadelerinin ard\u0131ndan daha da \u00f6nem kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira Ordu \u0130dare Mahkemesinin s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131, bu paralellikte ve mevcut hukuki d\u00fczenlemelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir karar olarak tam da bu a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnlerde al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ankara 3. \u0130dare Mahkemesi ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay 13. Dairesinin bu kararlar\u0131ndan sonra art\u0131k, sadece \u2018iptal\u2019 karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f HES projelerinin de\u011fil, hukuka, bilime, akla, yasa ve y\u00f6netmelikler ile mevzuatlara, uluslararas\u0131 anla\u015fmalara, koruma kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya konulan b\u00fct\u00fcn HES projeleriyle ilgili \u2018Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmalar\u0131\u2019 da iptal edilmelidir.\u201d\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong><em>Kaynak: Derelerin Karde\u015fli\u011fi Platformu<\/em><\/strong><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"&#8216;\u00c7ED Olumlu&#8217; ve &#8216;\u00c7ED gerekli de\u011fildir&#8217; kararlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunarak iptal edilmesiyle birlikte &#8216;Su Kullan\u0131m Hakk\u0131 Anla\u015fmalar\u0131&#8217; da, s\u00f6zle\u015fme nedeni ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyor\u2026\u00a0\n\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[599,399,1395],"class_list":{"0":"post-3417","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-genel","8":"tag-hesler","9":"tag-su-hakki","10":"tag-su-hakki-mucadelesi"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3417\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}