{"id":3709,"date":"2012-05-10T15:00:45","date_gmt":"2012-05-10T12:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=3709"},"modified":"2012-05-10T15:00:45","modified_gmt":"2012-05-10T12:00:45","slug":"aihmden-tarihi-barinma-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/aihmden-tarihi-barinma-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"A\u0130HM&#8217;den Tarihi Bar\u0131nma Karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><strong>Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, 24 Nisan 2012\u2019de Bulgaristan ile ilgili bir davada verdi\u011fi kararda, Sofya\u2019daki bir yerle\u015fim biriminden Romanlar\u0131n zorla tahliye edilmesi \u015feklindeki yerel karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak, bunun burada ya\u015fayan Romanlar\u0131n insan haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div> <\/div>\n<div>\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>Bulgar yetkililerin Sofya\u2019n\u0131n Batalova Vodenitsa b\u00f6lgesindeki belediyeye ait topraklar \u00fczerinde kurulan bir yerle\u015fim biriminden Romanlar\u0131 tahliye etme plan\u0131yla ilgili davada mahkeme, tahliye emrinin i\u00e7 hukuktaki bir yasaya dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve karar alma s\u00fcrecinde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fini, ancak bunlarda farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 i\u00e7eren dengenin g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM\u2019nin konuya ili\u015fkin bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201cBulgaristan\u2019dan \u2018Yordanova ve Di\u011ferleri\u2019yle ilgili davada (ba\u015fvuru no: 25446\/06) Dairenin bug\u00fcnk\u00fc karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerine (davac\u0131lara) y\u00f6nelik tahliye emrinin herhangi bir gelecekte y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin (\u00f6zel ya\u015fam ve aile ya\u015fam\u0131na sayg\u0131yla ilgili) 8. Maddesinin ihlali olaca\u011f\u0131na oybirli\u011fiyle karar vermi\u015ftir\u201d.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Davan\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM\u2019de g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada ba\u015fvuru sahipleri, Sofya varo\u015flar\u0131nda 250 Roman\u2019a ev sahipli\u011fi yapan Batalova Vodenitsa mahallesinde ya\u015fayan 23 Bulgar vatanda\u015f\u0131. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda, bu ki\u015filerin 1960\u2019l\u0131 ve 70\u2019li y\u0131llarda b\u00f6lgeye gelip yerle\u015ftikleri, daha yak\u0131n d\u00f6nemde 1990\u2019larda da gelenler oldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Buradaki evlerin derme \u00e7atma ve yasal izin olmadan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kanalizasyon ya da suyu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, burada ya\u015fayanlar\u0131n iki ortak \u00e7e\u015fmenin suyunu kulland\u0131klar\u0131 belirtilen karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, Romanlar\u0131n yerle\u015ftikleri topra\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nce devlete, 1996 sonras\u0131nda Sofya Belediyesi&#8217;ne ait oldu\u011fu kaydedildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Yasa olanak sa\u011flam\u0131yor\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Bu mahallede ya\u015fayan di\u011fer sakinler gibi A\u0130HM\u2019ne dava a\u00e7anlar\u0131n, in\u015fa ettikleri evlerin yasal stat\u00fcs\u00fc i\u00e7in u\u011fra\u015fmad\u0131klar\u0131, yoksul ve toplumdan izole edildikleri i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir yasal stat\u00fc kayd\u0131na ba\u015fvuramayacaklar\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri belirtildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, buna ek olarak, konuyla ilgili yasan\u0131n da onlara evlerinin m\u00fclkiyetini elde edebilmelerine olanak sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadesi yer ald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Roman gettolar\u0131na bo\u015faltma tehdidi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca, 1990\u2019lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren Sofya\u2019n\u0131n bir\u00e7ok b\u00f6lgesinde, yerle\u015fimlerde ya\u015fayan Romanlar ile Roman olmayan kom\u015fular\u0131 aras\u0131nda gerilimin b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, Roman yerle\u015fimleri konusunun yayg\u0131n bir \u015fekilde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve bir dizi \u00f6nde gelen politikac\u0131n\u0131n Sofya\u2019daki \u201cRoman gettolar\u0131\u201dn\u0131n bo\u015falt\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dair konu\u015fmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>2005: Zorla tahliye karar\u0131\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM karar\u0131nda, 2005\u2019e kadar ne devletin ne de belediye yetkililerinin, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin (davac\u0131) ve ailelerinin tahliye edilmesine y\u00f6nelik bir giri\u015fimde bulundu\u011fu belirtilerek, olay\u0131n geli\u015fimi \u015f\u00f6yle \u00f6zetlendi:\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>May\u0131s 2006\u2019da Sofya Belediye Meclisi, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin i\u015fgal etti\u011fi m\u00fccavir alan\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetini \u00f6zel bir yat\u0131r\u0131mc\u0131ya transfer etti. Bundan birka\u00e7 ay \u00f6nce, 17 Eyl\u00fcl 2005\u2019te, b\u00f6lgenin belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin zorla tahliye edilmesi talimat\u0131n\u0131 verdi. Bu, mahkemeye yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru nedeniyle durdu. Ocak 2006\u2019da Sofya mahkemesi, tahliye emrinin yasal oldu\u011funa karar verdi ve bu karar, daha sonra Y\u00fcksek \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan onayland\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin onlarca y\u0131ld\u0131r burada ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in bir tahliyenin orant\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zard\u0131 eden mahkemeler, i\u015fgal edilen topraklar i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir yasal sebep g\u00f6steremediklerini ve tahliye emrinin yasal oldu\u011funu saptad\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Haziran 2006\u2019da belediye yetkilileri, aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin de oldu\u011fu Batalova Vodenitsa\u2019n\u0131n yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 sakinlerinin bir hafta i\u00e7inde tahliye edilmesi ve evlerinin y\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 tasar\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131lar.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00fc d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>\u00c7o\u011funlukla Avrupa Parlamentosu \u00fcyelerinden gelen siyasi bask\u0131 sonucunda tahliye i\u015flemi yap\u0131lmad\u0131. Bununla birlikte belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131, bu yerle\u015fimin sakinleri i\u00e7in alternatif bar\u0131nma bulman\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu ki\u015filerin bar\u0131nma ihtiyac\u0131 olanlar aras\u0131nda kayd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve y\u0131llard\u0131r bekleme listesinde olan di\u011ferlerinin \u00fczerinde bunlara \u00f6ncelik tan\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kamuoyuna a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 tahliye emrinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi gerekti\u011fi hususunda \u0131srarl\u0131 oldu, Roman halk\u0131n\u0131n gidecek bir yeri olmamas\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi konu d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>2008: A\u0130HM, tahliyeleri engelledi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Bir ba\u015fka zorla tahliye giri\u015fiminin ard\u0131ndan Haziran 2008\u2019de A\u0130HM, ge\u00e7ici karar alarak Bulgaristan h\u00fck\u00fcmetine, ya\u015fl\u0131, \u00e7ocuk ve di\u011fer savunmas\u0131z ki\u015filerin bar\u0131nma g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flayacak tedbirler al\u0131n\u0131ncaya kadar, ba\u015fvuru sahibi davac\u0131lar\u0131n tahliye edilemeyece\u011fine i\u015faret etti. B\u00f6lgenin belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 da bu yerle\u015fim birimi sakinlerinin bar\u0131nma sorunu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcl\u00fcnceye kadar tahliye emrini ask\u0131ya ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi. A\u0130HM, daha sonra ge\u00e7ici tedbirleri kald\u0131rd\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Bu s\u0131rada, Bulgaristan\u2019da Romanlar\u0131n bar\u0131nma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n iyile\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir ulusal program kabul edildi. 2010 g\u00f6zlemci raporuna g\u00f6re, Romanlar i\u00e7in bar\u0131nma konusunda hi\u00e7bir ilerleme kaydedilmedi. Di\u011fer yandan medyada, Bulgaristan\u2019daki bir\u00e7ok b\u00f6lgede Romanlar i\u00e7in konut in\u015fa edilece\u011fi haberleri yer ald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>\u015eikayet, Usul ve Mahkemenin Bile\u015fimi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, dava a\u00e7an ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin, yetkililerin Eyl\u00fcl 2005\u2019teki zorla tahliye emrinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmas\u0131n\u0131n, A\u0130HS\u2019nin 3. Maddesi (gayriinsani ve onur k\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131), 8. Maddesi (\u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131), 13. Maddesi (etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131), 14. Maddesi (ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131) ve 1 Nolu Protokolun 1 Nolu Maddesi (m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131) \u00e7er\u00e7evesindeki haklar\u0131n ihlali olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri belirtildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM\u2019e ba\u015fvurunun 23 Haziran 2006\u2019da yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 aktar\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamaya g\u00f6re, s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131 alan Dairenin bile\u015fimi \u015f\u00f6yle:\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>Ba\u015fkan: Lech Garlicki (Polonya),\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar: David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson (\u0130zlanda), P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4 (Finlandiya), George Nicolaou (K\u0131br\u0131s), Ledi Bianku (Arnavutluk), Zdravka Kalaydjieva (Bulgaristan), Vincent A. de Gaetano (Malta) ve B\u00f6l\u00fcm Sekreteri Fato\u015f Arac\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Mahkemenin Karar\u0131\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM karar\u0131nda, 8. Madde \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde dava \u015f\u00f6yle de\u011ferlendirildi: \u201cMahkeme, i\u015fgal ettikleri evlerin yasal olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin y\u0131llardan beri bu derme \u00e7atma evlerde aileleriyle birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu evlerin onlar\u0131n evi (yuvas\u0131) oldu\u011funu g\u00f6zlemlemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin yerle\u015fim biriminden ve topluluklar\u0131ndan tahliye edilmeleri, \u00f6zel ve aile hayatlar\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkilenmesine yol a\u00e7acakt\u0131r.\u201d\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fgalcilerden topraklar\u0131n geri al\u0131nmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n kentsel kalk\u0131nma amac\u0131 ve yetkililer i\u00e7in me\u015fru olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, yetkililerin yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak belediye topraklar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fgal eden ba\u015fvuru sahiplerini tahliye etmesinin ilkesel olarak haklar\u0131 oldu\u011fu konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen kararda, bununla birlikte yetkililerin, Batalova Vodenitsa\u2019da yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 Roman yerle\u015fimlere onlarca y\u0131ld\u0131r m\u00fcsamaha g\u00f6sterdi\u011fine ve bunun da ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin bu yerle g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ba\u011flar geli\u015ftirmelerine, burada bir topluluk ya\u015fam\u0131 kurmalar\u0131na izin verdi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Bar\u0131nma g\u00fcvencesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckt\u00fcr\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Kararda, A\u0130HS \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ba\u015fvuru sahiplerine bar\u0131nma sa\u011flama zorunlulu\u011fu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak \u00f6zellikle korunmas\u0131z\/savunmas\u0131z ki\u015filere bar\u0131nma g\u00fcvencesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konusunda istisnai davalarda 8. Maddeden hareket edilebilece\u011fi kaydedildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM karar\u0131nda, ilgili yasa \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde belediye yetkililerinin, s\u00f6z konusu yerle\u015fimde ya\u015fayanlar\u0131n olas\u0131 tahliyesinin orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131na ya da \u00e7e\u015fitli \u00e7\u0131karlar bulundu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirmeye gerek duymad\u0131klar\u0131 belirtildi. Kararda, A\u0130HM\u2019nin, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesine uymayan yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n kendi i\u00e7inde tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 oldu\u011funu saptad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da yer ald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>H\u00fck\u00fcmet, alternatif y\u00f6ntemler geli\u015ftirmedi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuru sahibi davac\u0131lar\u0131n evlerinin g\u00fcvenlik ve sa\u011fl\u0131k endi\u015felerine yol a\u00e7an temel sa\u011fl\u0131k ve in\u015fa gereksinimlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z olmakla birlikte, h\u00fck\u00fcmetin binalar\u0131n yasall\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan yerlerde kanalizasyon ve i\u00e7me suyu tesisleri yap\u0131m\u0131 ile tahliyenin gerekti\u011fi yerlerde alternatif bar\u0131nma i\u00e7in yard\u0131m sa\u011flama gibi sorunlarla ba\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kacak alternatif y\u00f6ntemler g\u00f6stermedi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekildi. Kararda, \u201cBu nedenle, h\u00fck\u00fcmetin ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin tahliyesinin uygun bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm oldu\u011fu sav\u0131 zay\u0131flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d denildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Kararda, buna ilaveten tahliye emri yay\u0131mlanmadan \u00f6nce yetkililerin, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin tahliye halinde evsiz kalacaklar\u0131 riskini g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tersine bu riskin ilgisiz oldu\u011funu deklare ettikleri ifadesi yer ald\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Sorumluluk yerine getirilmedi\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM, ayr\u0131ca 8 Madde kapsam\u0131nda, sosyal a\u00e7\u0131dan avantajs\u0131z grup olan ba\u015fvuru sahibi davac\u0131lar\u0131n, belirli ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 kadar \u00f6zel durumunun da yetkililerin sorumlulu\u011fu \u00fcstlendi\u011fi orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k tespiti i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini, ancak bunun yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>H\u00fck\u00fcmetin, kom\u015fular\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 ba\u015fvuru sahiplerini \u015fikayet etti\u011fi arg\u00fcman\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kararda, Romanlar\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen su\u00e7lar ve sa\u011fl\u0131k riskleri gibi bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u015fikayetlerin, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ilkesine uyulmas\u0131 halinde uygun tedbirlerle hakl\u0131 olabilece\u011fi, ancak yetkililerin i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar gibi iddialar\u0131 soru\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, di\u011fer \u015fikayetlerin de yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 talepler i\u00e7erdi\u011fi belirtildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda A\u0130HM, bir yasaya dayan\u0131larak al\u0131nan 2005 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki tahliye emri ve karar verme s\u00fcrecindeki de\u011ferlendirmelerde, emrin \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen amaca orant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilerek, tahliye emrinin zorla uygulanmas\u0131 halinde bunun 8. Maddenin ihlali olaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u00e7\u0131klamada, davac\u0131lar\u0131n ihlal oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc di\u011fer A\u0130HS maddelerinin de de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ve 14. Madde \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ayr\u0131 bir konu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin di\u011fer \u015fikayetlerinin ayr\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesinin gerekmedi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>\u0130hlallerden ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmal\u0131, tedbirler al\u0131nmal\u0131\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM\u2019nin karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, alan\u0131n kararlar\u0131n ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren 46. Madde\u2019ye ili\u015fkin olarak da, yetkililerin karar\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi i\u00e7in onaylayaca\u011f\u0131 ve ilerde bu tip ihlallerden ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak genel tedbirlerin, yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fgal davalar\u0131nda bile kamu arazi ve binalar\u0131n\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik talimatlar\u0131n yerine getirilmesine y\u00f6nelik pratikte ve yasada bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, geri alman\u0131n ard\u0131ndaki amac\u0131n, bireysel etkilerinin ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvenceye alacak tedbirlerin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tan\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermesi gerekti\u011fi kaydedildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A\u0130HM karar\u0131nda, bireysel tedbirler konusunda, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin zarar\u0131n\u0131n tazmininin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve ihlale son verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, kararda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi Bulgar yetkililerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme gereklerine uymas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak tedbirler al\u0131n\u0131ncaya kadar 2005\u2019teki tahliye emrinin ask\u0131ya al\u0131nmas\u0131 ya da y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine h\u00fckmetti\u011fi bildirildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Karar a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda son olarak, hakkaniyete uygun tazminata ili\u015fkin adli tatmin konusunda 41. Madde i\u00e7in, A\u0130HM\u2019nin, 8. Maddenin ihlali bulgusunun, ba\u015fvuru sahiplerinin u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 manevi zarar\u0131n hakkaniyete uygun tazmini olu\u015fturdu\u011funa, maliyet ve harcamalar i\u00e7in Bulgaristan\u2019\u0131n ba\u015fvuru sahiplerine 4 bin avro \u00f6demesi gerekti\u011fine karar verdi\u011fi ifade edildi.\u00a0<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><strong>Haber, A\u0130HM&#8217;in 24 Nisan tarihli bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n orijinalinden Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu taraf\u0131ndan Sendika.Org i\u00e7in \u00e7evrilmi\u015ftir<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><em><strong>Kaynak: Sendika.Org<\/strong><\/em><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, 24 Nisan 2012\u2019de Bulgaristan ile ilgili bir davada verdi\u011fi kararda, Sofya\u2019daki bir yerle\u015fim biriminden Romanlar\u0131n zorla tahliye edilmesi \u015feklindeki yerel karara kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak, bunun burada ya\u015fayan Romanlar\u0131n insan haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali olaca\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti\u00a0\n\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3709","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-genel"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3709\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}