{"id":3927,"date":"2012-11-06T15:02:01","date_gmt":"2012-11-06T12:02:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=3927"},"modified":"2012-11-06T15:02:01","modified_gmt":"2012-11-06T12:02:01","slug":"boyle-kentsel-donusum-olmaz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/boyle-kentsel-donusum-olmaz\/","title":{"rendered":"‘B\u00f6yle Kentsel D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm Olmaz’"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bakanlar Kurulu’nun, Ankara Yukar\u0131 Dikmen Vadisi’ni “kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm geli\u015fim alan\u0131” ilan eden karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle, Dikmen Vadisi Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi tamamland\u0131. Bilirki\u015fi heyeti, projeye dair s\u0131n\u0131r onay i\u015fleminin \u015fehircilik ilkelerine, planlama esaslar\u0131na ve kamu yarar\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinde bulundu <\/strong><\/p>\n

Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi, Dikmen Vadisi’nde uygulamak istedi\u011fi kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm projesinin, a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar sonucu iptal edilmesi ve Vadi halk\u0131n\u0131n bar\u0131nma hakk\u0131 m\u00fccadelesindeki direncinin k\u0131r\u0131lamamas\u0131 \u00fczerine, 5393 Say\u0131l\u0131 Belediye Kanunu’nun “Kentsel D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm ve Geli\u015fim Alan\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 73. maddesinde yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi f\u0131rsat bilerek, konuyu Bakanlar Kurulu’na ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bakanlar Kurulu’nun, Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan 07.07.2010 tarih ve 2010\/667 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile de, Yukar\u0131 Dikmen Vadisi “kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm geli\u015fim alan\u0131” olarak ilan edilmi\u015f ve devam\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir belediyesi, “Dikmen Vadisi Son Etap Kentsel D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm Projesi” ad\u0131 ile, \u00f6nceki projeyi yeniden uygulamaya koymu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

Bakanlar Kurulu’nun s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Dikmen Vadisi Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde bir iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve dava, Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu davay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu avukatlar\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na de\u011finmi\u015fler, \u00f6z\u00fcnde bir ya\u011fma projesine yasall\u0131k ve gerek\u00e7e yarat\u0131lmak istendi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015flerdi. Davada, Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k yan\u0131nda \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Ankara B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi de davac\u0131 idare olarak yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Davay\u0131 ele alan Dan\u0131\u015ftay 6. Dairesi, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunda bir bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015f, bu ama\u00e7la Y\u0131ld\u0131z Teknik \u00dcniversitesi Mimarl\u0131k Fak\u00fcltesi \u015eehir B\u00f6lge Planlama B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile Fatih Sultan Mehmet \u00dcniversitesi M\u00fchendislik Mimarl\u0131k Fak\u00fcltesi Mimarl\u0131k B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc’nde g\u00f6rev yapan \u00fc\u00e7 bilim insan\u0131ndan olu\u015fan bir bilirki\u015fi heyeti se\u00e7ilmi\u015fti. S\u00f6z konusu bilirki\u015fi heyeti, Dikmen Vadisi’nde gelerek yerinde ke\u015fif i\u015flemi de yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u2019Planlama yok, analiz yok, halk\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yok\u2019
Bu kapsamda, \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015filik bilirki\u015fi heyeti taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor tamamlanarak Mahkemeye sunuldu. Toplam 20 sayfay\u0131 bulan 22.10.2012 tarihli bu raporda; projeye dair s\u0131n\u0131r onay i\u015fleminin \u015fehircilik ilkelerine, planlama esaslar\u0131na ve kamu yarar\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinde bulundu.<\/p>\n

Bilirki\u015filerin raporda yer alan son derece \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 tespitleri ve var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yle:<\/p>\n

* Kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm, t\u00fcm kentlinin haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 garanti alt\u0131na alabilecek olan planlama sistemi b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcnde ele al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle, t\u00fcm Ankaral\u0131lar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan elzem olan hava koridoru gere\u011fi gibi korunamamakta, kamu alanlar\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011fun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle olanaklar oldu\u011fu halde bu koridoru geli\u015ftirme olana\u011f\u0131 elden ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

* Bireysel haklara riayet edilip edilmedi\u011fi, yap\u0131 stokuna ili\u015fkin tespit fiziki analizler yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in belirsizlik ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

* Bireylerin kendi ya\u015fama alanlar\u0131nda ya\u015famlar\u0131n\u0131, kendi sosyo-k\u00fclt\u00fcrel yap\u0131lar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme olanaklar\u0131n\u0131n devam edip etmedi\u011fi veya \u00f6zg\u00fcr iradeleri ile zorlanmadan tercihlerini kullan\u0131p kullanmad\u0131klar\u0131 belirsizdir.<\/p>\n

* Planlama kararlar\u0131, topografya, jeolojik yap\u0131, zemin ko\u015fullar\u0131 gibi analizlere dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan g\u00fcvenli ya\u015fam alan\u0131 olu\u015fturman\u0131n ilk parametreleri dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bilirki\u015fi heyeti ayr\u0131ca; “Gecekondu sahiplerine hak ettikleri oranda haklar\u0131 verildi\u011finde, kamusal alanlar\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan gelir beklentisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kendi kendine yenileme maliyeti \u00e7\u0131karacak \u015fekilde eskiyen kent k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n yenilenmesi ve de \u00fcst\u00fcn kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131n da sa\u011flanmas\u0131 alternatifi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bunun sa\u011flanabilmesi i\u00e7in, s\u00fcrecin a\u00e7\u0131k \u015feffaf ve kat\u0131l\u0131ml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, projelerin ve ihalelerin denetlenmesi \u015fartt\u0131r” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne de yer verdi.<\/p>\n

\u2019Projenin vicdana, akla ve bilime ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131tland\u0131\u2019
Davan\u0131n avukat\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 zamanda Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu hukuk dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 olan Av. Ender B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ulha, konuyla Sendika.org\u2019a konu\u015ftu. B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ulha, s\u00f6z konusu bilirki\u015fi raporunun Dikmen Vadisi Kentsel D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm Projesi\u2019ne dair \u00f6teden beri bilim \u00e7evreleri ve kamuoyu taraf\u0131ndan dile getirilen hakl\u0131 itiraz ve kayg\u0131lar\u0131 bir kez daha teyit etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Ortada kamunun ve kentin yarar\u0131na bir i\u015f yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bu projenin vicdan yan\u0131nda bilime ve akla da ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun kan\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getiren B\u00fcy\u00fck\u00e7ulha s\u00f6zlerini \u015f\u00f6yle noktalad\u0131:<\/p>\n

\u201dBilim insanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve bilim kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n bu hakl\u0131 tespitinin, yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131 ve b\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir belediyesi taraf\u0131ndan da art\u0131k dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131, kentte ya\u015fayan yurtta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z ve \u00f6zellikle vadi halk\u0131 i\u00e7in uzun y\u0131llard\u0131r bir karabasana d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fen mevcut projeye son verilmesini, nihayetinde halk\u0131n ve kentin yarar\u0131na, halk\u0131n bar\u0131nma ve ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6zeten yap\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131mlar\u0131n at\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 diliyoruz”<\/p>\n

Kaynak: Sendika.Org<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bakanlar Kurulu’nun, Ankara Yukar\u0131 Dikmen Vadisi’ni “kentsel d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm geli\u015fim alan\u0131” ilan eden karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle, Dikmen Vadisi Bar\u0131nma Hakk\u0131 B\u00fcrosu \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, bilirki\u015fi incelemesi tamamland\u0131. Bilirki\u015fi heyeti, projeye dair s\u0131n\u0131r onay i\u015fleminin \u015fehircilik ilkelerine, planlama esaslar\u0131na ve kamu yarar\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinde bulundu \n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[216,317,565],"class_list":{"0":"post-3927","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-genel","8":"tag-barinma-hakki","9":"tag-dikmen","10":"tag-kentsel-donusum"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3927\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}