{"id":4921,"date":"2013-08-21T14:10:39","date_gmt":"2013-08-21T11:10:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=4921"},"modified":"2013-08-21T14:10:39","modified_gmt":"2013-08-21T11:10:39","slug":"emek-sinemasi-hakkindaki-davanin-reddi-karari-danistay-tarafindan-bozuldu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/emek-sinemasi-hakkindaki-davanin-reddi-karari-danistay-tarafindan-bozuldu\/","title":{"rendered":"Emek Sinemas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Davan\u0131n Reddi Karar\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay Taraf\u0131ndan Bozuldu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>TMMOB Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fckkent \u015eubesi&#8217;nin Cercle d&#8217;Orient Binas\u0131 ve Emek Sinemas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131 bar\u0131nd\u0131ran yap\u0131 adas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0130stanbul Yenileme Alanlar\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu&#8217;nun 17.09.2009 ve 09.10.2009 tarihlerinde al\u0131nan kararlar\u0131 ve ekli avan projelerinin iptaline ili\u015fkin, K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na 12.03.2010 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava, \u0130stanbul 9. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nde yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclecek.<br \/><\/strong> <br \/>S\u00f6z konusu dava, 2012 Aral\u0131k ay\u0131nda karara ba\u011flanarak s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015fti. <\/p>\n<p>TMMOB Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fckkent \u015eubesi, \u0130stanbul 9. \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 19.07.2012 tarihinde al\u0131nan karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeni ile Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, aksi bir durumun bir hukuk devleti a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kabul edilemez oldu\u011funu vurgulayarak; geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez zararlara neden olunmamas\u0131 ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 ve temyiz incelemesi sonucunda an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 istemiyle Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;a ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftu. Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ond\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc Daire 10.07.2013 tarihinde, \u0130stanbul 9. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 ve dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fi ile karar verdi.<\/p>\n<p>Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararda \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ilgili; &#8220;davac\u0131 meslek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan \u0130stanbul Yenileme Alanlar\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu&#8217;na yap\u0131lan 20.11.2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine, an\u0131lan Kurulun 30.12.2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 1515 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile dava konusu 17.09.2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 954 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n davac\u0131ya bildirildi\u011fi, bu tarihten \u00f6nce bu karar\u0131n davac\u0131ya tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine veya davac\u0131n\u0131n bu karardan herhangi bir \u015fekilde haberdar oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir bilgi ve belgenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakta olup, Kurul g\u00fcndeminin davac\u0131ya bildirilmi\u015f olmne yapal\u0131m?as\u0131ndan hareket edilerek nihai olarak al\u0131nan karar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden de haberdar olunmu\u015f say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan, karar\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnden itibaren dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle, davan\u0131n s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddine ili\u015fkin kararda hukuki isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir&#8221; ifadelerine yer veriliyor.<\/p>\n<p>Bununla birlikte \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6sterilen bir di\u011fer gerek\u00e7e de davaya konu olan kararla uygun bulunan avan projelerden sonra parseldeki yap\u0131larla ilgili olarak nihai projelerin haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunlar hakk\u0131nda kararlar al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle konusunun kalmamas\u0131yd\u0131. Dan\u0131\u015ftay&#8217;\u0131n verdi\u011fi son kararda ise; kurul taraf\u0131ndan daha sonra al\u0131nan kararlarda, dava konusu kararla uygun bulunan avan projenin iptal edilmedi\u011fi veya yeni bir avan projenin kabul edilmedi\u011fi, bilakis s\u00f6z konusu kararlar\u0131n bu avan projeye dayal\u0131 olarak al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, gerek icrailik vasf\u0131 devam eden avan proje y\u00f6n\u00fcnden gerekse karardaki di\u011fer husular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n esas\u0131 incelenmek suretiyle bir karar verilmesi gerekirken aksi y\u00f6ndeki idare mahkemesi karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi vurgulan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p>21 May\u0131s tarihinde y\u0131k\u0131lan Emek Sinemas\u0131 ve i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu yap\u0131 kompleksine dair hukuki s\u00fcrecin devam edece\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelen bu \u00f6nemli ve hakl\u0131 kararla dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131 yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fecek olan \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nin nas\u0131l bir karar verece\u011fi ise merak konusu.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>mimarist.org\/Derya Karada\u011f<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"TMMOB Mimarlar Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fckkent \u015eubesi&#8217;nin Cercle d&#8217;Orient Binas\u0131 ve Emek Sinemas\u0131&#8217;n\u0131 bar\u0131nd\u0131ran yap\u0131 adas\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0130stanbul Yenileme Alanlar\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma B\u00f6lge Kurulu&#8217;nun 17.09.2009 ve 09.10.2009 tarihlerinde al\u0131nan kararlar\u0131 ve ekli avan projelerinin iptaline ili\u015fkin, K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131&#8217;na 12.03.2010 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava, \u0130stanbul 9. \u0130dare Mahkemesi&#8217;nde yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclecek.\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[430,1939],"class_list":{"0":"post-4921","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-genel","8":"tag-emek-sinemasi","9":"tag-kent-mucadelesi"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4921\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}