{"id":9412,"date":"2014-03-24T13:18:10","date_gmt":"2014-03-24T11:18:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=9412"},"modified":"2019-01-28T20:40:59","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T17:40:59","slug":"taksim-dayanismasi-iddianamesi-yoklukla-maluldur-erkut-guzel-birgun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/taksim-dayanismasi-iddianamesi-yoklukla-maluldur-erkut-guzel-birgun\/","title":{"rendered":"Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 iddianamesi yoklukla maluld\u00fcr \u2013 Erkut G\u00fczel (BirG\u00fcn)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Taksim Meydan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 fikir ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n yasak oldu\u011fu bir yer olarak ilan eden bizzat Erdo\u011fan\u2019d\u0131r. \u00d6l\u00fcmlerle sonu\u00e7lan polis sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n emrini verdi\u011fini bizzat ikrar eden yine Erdo\u011fan\u2019d\u0131r. Yani su\u00e7 varsa vakay\u0131 yaratan\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir ki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 kurulsun.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>8 Temmuz 2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130stanbul Valisi H\u00fcseyin Avni Mutlu\u2019nun Gezi Park\u0131\u2019na y\u00f6nelik olarak \u201cHer isteyen \u0130stanbullu Parka Gelebilir\u201d \u015feklindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan parka y\u00f6nelen binlerce insan gibi, Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 \u00fcyesi demokratik kitle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc temsilcileri de Gezi Park\u0131\u2019na gitmek istemi\u015ftir. Gezi Park\u0131\u2019n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve herkesin Gezi Park\u0131\u2019na girebilece\u011fini bas\u0131n yolu ile ilan eden Vali\u2019ye ba\u011fl\u0131 polisler i\u00e7lerinde Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu, Ay\u015fe M\u00fccella Yap\u0131c\u0131, Beyza Metin, Ender \u0130mrek ve Haluk A\u011fabeyo\u011flu\u2019nun da oldu\u011fu onlarca ki\u015fiyi \u015fiddet kullanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Ve Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131\u2019na y\u00f6nelik operasyon ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu, Ay\u015fe M\u00fccella Yap\u0131c\u0131, Beyza Metin, Ender \u0130mrek ve Haluk A\u011fabeyo\u011flu hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra yaz\u0131ya d\u00f6k\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, \u00fcste arama ve el koyma(cep telefonlar\u0131 dahil) karar\u0131 da g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tarihinden sonra al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hatta ev aramas\u0131 kararlar\u0131 da bir g\u00fcn sonra al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 temsilcileri hakk\u0131nda verilen yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f\u2019un verdi\u011fi yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 30. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu hakk\u0131nda verilen yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lma gerek\u00e7esi savc\u0131l\u0131k makam\u0131 i\u00e7in ibretliktir. Mahkeme adli tabip olan Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu\u2019nun adliye i\u00e7inde dahili telefonu varken yakalama karar\u0131 verilmesini hukuka uygun bulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f talebiyle ve \u0130stanbul 34. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi h\u00e2kimi imzas\u0131 ile verdi\u011fi arama ve el koyma karar\u0131nda \u201cdelillerin toplanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla\u201d ibaresine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Arama karar\u0131nda Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 temsilcilerine isnat edilen su\u00e7 bile belirtilmemi\u015ftir. Yani hangi su\u00e7 i\u00e7in hangi delilin toplanmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 bile ortada yokken, Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu gibi 25 y\u0131ll\u0131k bir adli tabibin evi \u00e7ilingir ile a\u00e7\u0131larak talan edilmi\u015ftir. Bu arama karar\u0131, itiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 7. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi h\u00e2kimi imzas\u0131 ile verilen kararla (Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 temsilcileri g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda iken al\u0131nan karard\u0131r) ki\u015filerin \u00fczerinden \u00e7\u0131kan materyaller i\u00e7in verilmi\u015f arama, el koyma ve inceleme yetkisi polise verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi \u00fcst aramaya ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>T\u00fcm adli kararlar\u0131n, yani savc\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f taraf\u0131ndan polis eliyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturman\u0131n yoklukla malul oldu\u011fu, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bizzat mahkemelerce teyit edilmi\u015ftir. AKP d\u00f6neminin klasik y\u00f6ntemi olarak mahkemeler yine y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin onama kurumu gibi kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin adli arama karar\u0131 verilebilmesi i\u00e7in hakk\u0131nda arama karar\u0131 al\u0131nacak ki\u015finin bir su\u00e7 i\u015fleme veya buna i\u015ftirak veyahut yatakl\u0131k etme konusunda makul (akla uygun) \u015f\u00fcphe alt\u0131nda olmas\u0131 gerekir. Somut olayda isnad edilen su\u00e7 ile arama karar\u0131 konusunda bu ba\u011f yokken s\u0131rf cezaland\u0131rma ama\u00e7lanarak Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak lanse edilmek istenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6nce Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131ndan fotokopi alarak taraf olan AKP, daha sonra avukatlar\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi sunmu\u015ftur. Dilek\u00e7eye y\u00fczlerce sayfa tweet d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fc sunarak su\u00e7 i\u015flendi\u011fi anlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve uydurma bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc yarat\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. AKP\u2019nin bu m\u00fcdahalesi sonu\u00e7 vermi\u015ftir. Savc\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f taraf\u0131ndan imzalanarak \u0130stanbul 33. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne sunulan 30.01.2014 tarihli iddianamede Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, kendisi ile ilgili olmayan olaylardan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011fu iddia edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 33. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi h\u00e2kimi iddianameyi, iddia edilen olaylar ile su\u00e7 aras\u0131nda ba\u011f kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, yani iddianamenin as\u0131ls\u0131z oldu\u011funu belirterek savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa iade etmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 33. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi iade karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz eden savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131, a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesince reddedilince, ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k yeni bir iddianamenin yaz\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in dosyay\u0131 ba\u015fka bir savc\u0131ya vermek zorunda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Savc\u0131 Mesut Erdin\u00e7 Bayhan\u2019\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan yeni iddianame bu sefer \u0130stanbul 33. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015f ve dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130lk duru\u015fma 12.06.2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Kabul edilen iddianamede eskiden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olan AKP\u2019nin t\u00fcm iddialar\u0131na yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 \u00f6zetle \u201c\u0130stanbul halk\u0131n\u0131 Taksim meydan\u0131nda kanunsuz g\u00f6steri ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7in \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 ve \u0130stanbul\u2019da kamu d\u00fczeninin, g\u00fcvenli\u011finin ciddi \u015fekilde zarar g\u00f6rmesine neden olduklar\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olmakla isnat edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Taksim Meydan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 fikir ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n yasak oldu\u011fu bir yer olarak ilan eden bizzat R.T. Erdo\u011fan\u2019d\u0131r. \u00d6l\u00fcmlerle sonu\u00e7lan polis sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n emrini verdi\u011fini bizzat ikrar eden yine R.T. Erdo\u011fan\u2019d\u0131r. Yani su\u00e7 varsa vakay\u0131 yaratan\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir ki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131 kurulsun. H\u00fck\u00fcmetin ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki 1 May\u0131s eylemlerine ili\u015fkin uygulamalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Taksim Meydan\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 1 May\u0131s 2008 y\u0131l\u0131 etkinlikleri hakk\u0131nda verilen 27 Kas\u0131m 2012 tarihli D\u0130SK ve KESK V. T\u00fcrkiye Davas\u0131 Ba\u015fvuru no. 38676\/08 olan Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi Karar\u0131, toplanma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Taksim Meydan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n yasaklanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 teyit etmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla M\u00fclki Amir Olan \u0130stanbul Valisi H\u00fcseyin Avni Mutlu ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc ve \u0130lgili amirler hakk\u0131nda ve kanunsuz emri uygulayan polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda Kasten \u00d6ld\u00fcrmeye Te\u015febb\u00fcs, Kasten Yaralama ve G\u00f6revi \u0130hmal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, sadece bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sosyal medya \u00fczerinden a\u00e7\u0131klayan Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc oldu\u011funun iddia olundu\u011fu dava yoklukla maluld\u00fcr. Gezi ve Haziran direni\u015fi bu \u00fclkenin ayd\u0131nl\u0131k gelece\u011fi i\u00e7in \u00e7abalayanlar\u0131n ortak eme\u011fidir. Demokrasi ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck talebini y\u00fcksek sesle s\u00f6yleyen Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 su\u00e7lu ilan edilerek haziran isyan\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fruiyeti azalt\u0131lmak istenmektedir. Ki bunun beyhude oldu\u011fu T\u00fcrkiye halklar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00e2l\u00e2 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gezi ruhu pratikleri (bu konuda en yak\u0131n \u00f6rnek Berkin Elvan i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen cenaze t\u00f6renine kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr) ve yarg\u0131lama safhas\u0131yla da ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Taksim Meydan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 fikir ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n yasak oldu\u011fu bir yer olarak ilan&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4689],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-9412","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-secki"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9412\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}