{"id":9504,"date":"2014-03-28T19:03:03","date_gmt":"2014-03-28T17:03:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politeknik.org.tr\/\/?p=9504"},"modified":"2019-01-28T22:07:44","modified_gmt":"2019-01-28T19:07:44","slug":"taksim-dayanismasi-asil-biz-itham-ediyoruz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/taksim-dayanismasi-asil-biz-itham-ediyoruz\/","title":{"rendered":"Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131: As\u0131l biz itham ediyoruz!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bug\u00fcn \u00c7a\u011flayan Adliyesi\u2019nde bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yaparak Dayan\u0131\u015fma ile ilgili soru\u015fturmay\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcren kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu. Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 iddianameleri haz\u0131rlayan savc\u0131lar ve arama kararlar\u0131n\u0131 veren yarg\u0131\u00e7lar hakk\u0131nda da HSYK\u2019ya \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esi verdi.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 temsilcileri avukatlar\u0131 ile birlikte 28 Mart 2013 Cuma g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00c7a\u011flayan Adliyesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulu\u015farak Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ile ilgili soru\u015fturmay\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcren kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulundu. Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 iddianameleri haz\u0131rlayan savc\u0131lar ve arama kararlar\u0131n\u0131 veren yarg\u0131\u00e7lar hakk\u0131nda da HSYK\u2019ya \u015fikayette bulundu<\/p>\n

Bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 \u0130stanbul Tabip Odas\u0131 Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Taner G\u00f6ren okudu.<\/p>\n

Hakim ve savc\u0131lar hukuka uygun davranmad\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan HSYK\u2019ya yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f, \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Hakimi Mustafa Tok, \u0130stanbul 34. Sulh Ceza Hakimi \u0130slam \u00c7i\u00e7ek hakk\u0131nda hukuka uygun olmayan, haks\u0131z verilen yakalama, arama, \u00fcst aramas\u0131 ve el koyma kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun 109, 120, 134,135 ve 257 inci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak gerekli cezalar\u0131n verilmesi istendi.<\/p>\n

Kolluk kuvvetleri hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusu<\/strong><\/p>\n

HSYK\u2019ya yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru ile birlikte ayn\u0131 zamanda kolluk kuvvetleri hakk\u0131nda da su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu. \u0130stanbul N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na yap\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusunda 42 polis sicil numaralar\u0131 ile belirtildi. Su\u00e7 duyurusunda Taksim Gezisi\u2019ne do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken hi\u00e7 bir uyar\u0131 dahi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, \u015fiddet kullan\u0131larak g\u00f6z alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131plak arama, tuvalete \u00e7\u0131karmama, giysi, ila\u00e7 vermeme gibi uygulamalar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ve sonras\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131, su\u00e7 niteli\u011findeki soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulayan, ger\u00e7ekleri yans\u0131tmayan Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile \u201cOlaylar\u0131n Kronolojik A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metni d\u00fczenleyen ve an\u0131lan dosya kapsam\u0131nda mevcut di\u011fer belgeleri haz\u0131rlayan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun 86, 94, 96, 109, 113, 120, 134,135 ve 267 inci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 istendi.<\/p>\n

Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 taraf\u0131dan yap\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusu ve HSYK\u2019ya iletilen \u015fikayet dilek\u00e7esinin metni a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan HSYK\u2019ya yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru metninin a\u00e7\u0131klama b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc;<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma esnas\u0131nda CMK madde 160 uyar\u0131nca \u015f\u00fcphelilerin lehine ve aleyhine olan delilleri ara\u015ft\u0131rmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu halde; haz\u0131rlanan iddianamede ne san\u0131klar\u0131n ifadeleri ne de polisler taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131rlanan fezlekeli tahkikat evrak\u0131, olay yakalama ve savc\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130ddianame yaln\u0131zca polisin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 evraklara dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f, Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yeni bir tahkikat yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Usule uygun haz\u0131rlanmam\u0131\u015f olan bu iddianame ile m\u00fcvekkillere isnat edilen su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin delil toplanmam\u0131\u015f,gerek \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 30.01.2014 g\u00fcn, 2013\/96961 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 gerekse de \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 28.02.2014 g\u00fcn, 2014\/25504 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131 iddianamelerin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda yasaya ve usule uygun davran\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kolluk ve Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmedi\u011fi ve (belki de daha \u00f6nemlisi) yarg\u0131lamaya konu olayda kollu\u011fun usul\u00fcne uygun da\u011f\u0131lma uyar\u0131s\u0131 yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n; hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde zor kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 08.07.2013 tarihli g\u00f6zalt\u0131lar sonras\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131, su\u00e7 niteli\u011findeki soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunun sonucunda fezleke haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fmu\u015ftur.<\/em><\/p>\n

Daha a\u00e7\u0131k bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle, 08.07.2013 saat 22:00\u2032de d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi belirtilen Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131 da \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 11.07.2013 g\u00fcn ve 47909374.16769.(12256).2013\/Su\u00e7 No:255 say\u0131l\u0131 \u201cOlaylar\u0131n Kronolojik A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metni d\u00fczenleyen kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulayarak haks\u0131z yere zor kullanarak insanlar\u0131 haks\u0131z bi\u00e7imde \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yoksun b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015f, yasak soru\u015fturma usullerine ba\u015fvurarak su\u00e7 i\u015flemi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu olayda kollu\u011fun usul\u00fcne uygun da\u011f\u0131l\u0131n uyar\u0131s\u0131 yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve t\u00fcm\u00fc ile hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde zor kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu; haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fu ya da ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle olayda haklar\u0131nda iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan 2911 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 28\/1 inci maddesinin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dahi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi gere\u011fi adli kolluk olarak i\u015flem yapan, i\u015flem yapmas\u0131 gereken kolluk g\u00f6revlileri Ba\u015fbakan Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan\u2019\u0131n ve Vali H\u00fcseyin Avni Mutlu\u2019nun siyasi tutum ve talimatlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bir toplant\u0131ya y\u0131ld\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u00fcdahale ederek insanlar\u0131 g\u00f6z alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kolluk, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn toplu kullan\u0131m\u0131, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hakk\u0131, ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ilgili olarak hem \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesinin ortaya koydu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere hem de Yarg\u0131tay\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n yerle\u015fik uygulamas\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak yurtta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131za \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015f, haks\u0131z yere g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerini k\u0131s\u0131tlam\u0131\u015f ve Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu, Ay\u015fe M\u00fccella Yap\u0131c\u0131, Beyza Metin, Ender \u0130mrek ve Haluk A\u011fabeyo\u011flu isimli be\u015f yurtta\u015f\u0131n konut dokunulmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edilmesine neden olmu\u015ftur.<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu arama kararlar\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi el koyma kararlar\u0131 da hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

An\u0131lan arama kararlar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131 yap\u0131labilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n kolluk arama i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc kay\u0131t yapm\u0131\u015f; aranan mekanlarda el koyulmayan materyalleri dahi g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc olarak kaydetmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, kolluk bilgisayar\/dijital verilerle ilgili \u201ctransport\u201d i\u015flemlerini de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ki\u015finin kendisinin yahut vekilinin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu zorunlulu\u011fa dahi uyulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Belge incelemesi niteli\u011findeki t\u00fcm i\u015flem ve uygulamalar\u0131n Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 ya da Hakim taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi gerekirken dilek\u00e7emize konu olayda adli kolluk olarak uymas\u0131 gereken hi\u00e7 bir kurala uymayan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri bu kurala da uymam\u0131\u015f ve belge incelemesi i\u015flem ve uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc kolluk taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Adli kolluk, kolluk amiri olan savc\u0131l\u0131k makam\u0131nca denetime tabi tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131 arama kararlar\u0131 i\u00e7in inceleyen hakimlerde hi\u00e7bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k tespit etmeyerek g\u00f6revlerini a\u00e7\u0131k olarak k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca kollu\u011fun \u015f\u00fcphelilerin g\u00f6z alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda da \u00e7\u0131plak arama ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere tuvalete \u00e7\u0131karmama, giysi ve ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 vermeme ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere pek \u00e7ok hak ihlali ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini de vurgulamak isteriz.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kollu\u011fun 08.07.2013 tarihli \u201cOlay Tutana\u011f\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndaki ki\u015fileri anma s\u0131ras\u0131 gerek \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 30.01.2014 g\u00fcn, 2013\/96961 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 gerekse de \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 28.02.2014 g\u00fcn, 2014\/25504 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 iddianamelerinde yinelenmi\u015f ve sonu\u00e7 olarak s\u00f6z konusu tutanakta kollu\u011fun belirledi\u011fi s\u0131ralamadaki ilk be\u015f ki\u015fi \u201csu\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131 ile \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f\u2019un verdi\u011fi yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 30. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/136 D. \u0130\u015f Karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu \u00f6zellikle vurgulamak isteriz.<\/em><\/p>\n

Tututuklanma talebiyle sevk edilen \u0130stanbul 38. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nce 2013\/56 Sorgu No\u2019lu dosyas\u0131ndan \u201csu\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut olgular\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 savc\u0131l\u0131k makam\u0131 itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Fakat bu tiraz da reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 34. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi Hakimi \u0130slam \u00c7i\u00e7ek\u2019in imzas\u0131 ile verdi\u011fi \u0130stanbul C. Savc\u0131s\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f 2013\/96961 nolu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda talep edilen arama ve el koyma talebini \u201cdelilerin toplanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle 09.07.2013 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kabul etmi\u015ftir. Arama karar\u0131 karar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphelilere isnad edilen su\u00e7 belirtilmemi\u015ftir. Bu arama karar\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 8. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/109 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yap\u0131lan haks\u0131z arama sonucu elde edilen materyallerin iadesi i\u00e7in 12.07.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nde \u00fcst aramas\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan e\u015fyalar\u0131 iade etmeyecekleri bildirilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin Hakimi Mustafa Tok\u2019un imzas\u0131 ile 2013\/430 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda iken al\u0131nan karar sonucu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerinde \u00e7\u0131kan materyaller i\u00e7in verilmi\u015f arama, el koyma ve inceleme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/430 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile verilen bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 2013\/860 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile \u00fcst aramaya ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi gibi;\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, g\u00f6stericilerin \u015fiddet olaylar\u0131na giri\u015fmedikleri durumlarda \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 11 inci maddesi ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan toplant\u0131 yapma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc amac\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmayacaksa yetkililerin toplant\u0131lara belirli bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde tolerans g\u00f6stermeleri gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. (Nurettin Aldemir ve di\u011ferleri v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcne dokunulmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6zellikle de g\u00f6steride bulunanlar\u0131n g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya\u015fam\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na dair her t\u00fcrden engellemenin hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda gerek\u00e7e olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 dahi kabul edilemez bulmaktad\u0131r. (Sergei Kuznetsov v. Rusya)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak kamu idaresi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde \u201cho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, kanun d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir durumun toplant\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmesini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fini dahi hat\u0131rlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zellikle vurgulamak isteriz. (Cisse v. Fransa \/ Oya Ataman v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6tesi, \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi kamu idaresinin yaln\u0131zca bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumakla de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda bu hakka dolayl\u0131 olarak usuls\u00fcz s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar getirilmesinden ka\u00e7\u0131nmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olduklar\u0131n\u0131; \u00f6te yandan \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 11 inci maddesinin esasen bireyi, g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken kamu g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin keyfi m\u00fcdahalelerine kar\u015f\u0131 korumay\u0131 hedefledi\u011fini, \u00fcstelik bu haklar\u0131n etkin bir bi\u00e7imde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131 ile pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler de do\u011furabilece\u011fini belirtmektedir. (Djavit An v. T\u00fcrkiye \/ G\u00fcn ve di\u011ferleri v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Mahkemenin i\u00e7tihad\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n dahi adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi ortad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n ceza hukuku temel ilkeleri do\u011frultusunda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi gereklili\u011fi ortadad\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yetkililer, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve \u015feffaf hareket etmemi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili bir bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan temel prensiplerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere dayanaktan yoksun, kanunsuz ve alelacele soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclemez yahut soru\u015fturma yapma gereklili\u011fi olan, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde bu g\u00f6rev savsaklanamaz. (Zelilof v. Yunanistan) Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar kapsam\u0131nda delillerin hukuka uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dahi kesin olmamaktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu konudaki yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda delilerin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve hukuka uygunlu\u011funun sa\u011flanabilmesi i\u00e7in kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kurallar hi\u00e7 bir istisna olmaks\u0131z\u0131n eksiksiz yerine getirilmelidir ve aksi a\u00e7\u0131k bir ihlal te\u015fkil eder. (Tanr\u0131kulu v. T\u00fcrkiye, ve G\u00fcl v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu soru\u015fturma ve an\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n t\u00fcm kapsam\u0131n\u0131n da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koydu\u011fu \u00fczere olayda 2911 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 28\/1 inci maddesinin unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kken; Taksim Gezisi\u2019ne do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken hi\u00e7 bir uyar\u0131 dahi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, \u015fiddet kullan\u0131larak g\u00f6z alt\u0131na ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda 2013\/96961 numaral\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda hukuka uygun olmayan, haks\u0131z verilen yakalama, arama, \u00fcst aramas\u0131 ve el koyma karar\u0131 veren \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak eylemlerine uyan T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun 109, 120, 134,135 ve 257 inci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak gerekli cezalar\u0131n tesisi talep etmek zorunlu olmu\u015ftur.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Kolluk kuvvetleri hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusu metni a\u00e7\u0131klama b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc;<\/strong><\/p>\n

“\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma esnas\u0131nda CMK madde 160 uyar\u0131nca \u015f\u00fcphelilerin lehine ve aleyhine olan delilleri ara\u015ft\u0131rmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu halde; haz\u0131rlanan iddianamede ne san\u0131klar\u0131n ifadeleri ne de polisler taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131rlanan fezlekeli tahkikat evrak\u0131, olay yakalama ve savc\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130ddianame yaln\u0131zca polisin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 evraklara dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f, Savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yeni bir tahkikat yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Usule uygun haz\u0131rlanmam\u0131\u015f olan bu iddianame ile m\u00fcvekkillere isnat edilen su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin delil toplanmam\u0131\u015f,gerek \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 30.01.2014 g\u00fcn, 2013\/96961 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 gerekse de \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 28.02.2014 g\u00fcn, 2014\/25504 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131 iddianamelerin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda yasaya ve usule uygun davran\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kolluk ve Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmedi\u011fi ve (belki de daha \u00f6nemlisi) yarg\u0131lamaya konu olayda kollu\u011fun usul\u00fcne uygun da\u011f\u0131lma uyar\u0131s\u0131 yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n; hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde zor kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 08.07.2013 tarihli g\u00f6zalt\u0131lar sonras\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131, su\u00e7 niteli\u011findeki soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunun sonucunda fezleke haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fmu\u015ftur.<\/em><\/p>\n

Daha a\u00e7\u0131k bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle, 08.07.2013 saat 22:00\u2032de d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi belirtilen Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131 da \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 11.07.2013 g\u00fcn ve 47909374.16769.(12256).2013\/Su\u00e7 No:255 say\u0131l\u0131 \u201cOlaylar\u0131n Kronolojik A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metni d\u00fczenleyen kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulayarak haks\u0131z yere zor kullanarak insanlar\u0131 haks\u0131z bi\u00e7imde \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yoksun b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015f, yasak soru\u015fturma usullerine ba\u015fvurarak su\u00e7 i\u015flemi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu olayda kollu\u011fun usul\u00fcne uygun da\u011f\u0131l\u0131n uyar\u0131s\u0131 yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve t\u00fcm\u00fc ile hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde zor kullanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu; haz\u0131rl\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fu ya da ba\u015fka bir s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle olayda haklar\u0131nda iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan 2911 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 28\/1 inci maddesinin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dahi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Olay\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi gere\u011fi adli kolluk olarak i\u015flem yapan, i\u015flem yapmas\u0131 gereken kolluk g\u00f6revlileri Ba\u015fbakan Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan\u2019\u0131n ve Vali H\u00fcseyin Avni Mutlu\u2019nun siyasi tutum ve talimatlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bir toplant\u0131ya y\u0131ld\u0131rma ama\u00e7l\u0131 m\u00fcdahale ederek insanlar\u0131 g\u00f6z alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kolluk, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn toplu kullan\u0131m\u0131, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hakk\u0131, ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ile ilgili olarak hem \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesinin ortaya koydu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere hem de Yarg\u0131tay\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n yerle\u015fik uygulamas\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak yurtta\u015flar\u0131m\u0131za \u015fiddet uygulam\u0131\u015f, haks\u0131z yere g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerini k\u0131s\u0131tlam\u0131\u015f ve Ali \u00c7erkezo\u011flu, Ay\u015fe M\u00fccella Yap\u0131c\u0131, Beyza Metin, Ender \u0130mrek ve Haluk A\u011fabeyo\u011flu isimli be\u015f yurtta\u015f\u0131n konut dokunulmazl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edilmesine neden olmu\u015ftur.<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu arama kararlar\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi el koyma kararlar\u0131 da hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

An\u0131lan arama kararlar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131 yap\u0131labilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n kolluk arama i\u015flemleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc kay\u0131t yapm\u0131\u015f; aranan mekanlarda el koyulmayan materyalleri dahi g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc olarak kaydetmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, kolluk bilgisayar\/dijital verilerle ilgili \u201ctransport\u201d i\u015flemlerini de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ki\u015finin kendisinin yahut vekilinin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu zorunlulu\u011fa dahi uyulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Belge incelemesi niteli\u011findeki t\u00fcm i\u015flem ve uygulamalar\u0131n Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 ya da Hakim taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi gerekirken dilek\u00e7emize konu olayda adli kolluk olarak uymas\u0131 gereken hi\u00e7 bir kurala uymayan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri bu kurala da uymam\u0131\u015f ve belge incelemesi i\u015flem ve uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc kolluk taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca kollu\u011fun \u015f\u00fcphelilerin g\u00f6z alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda da \u00e7\u0131plak arama ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere tuvalete \u00e7\u0131karmama, giysi ve ila\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 vermeme ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere pek \u00e7ok hak ihlali ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini de vurgulamak isteriz.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kollu\u011fun 08.07.2013 tarihli \u201cOlay Tutana\u011f\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndaki ki\u015fileri anma s\u0131ras\u0131 gerek \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 30.01.2014 g\u00fcn, 2013\/96961 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 gerekse de \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 28.02.2014 g\u00fcn, 2014\/25504 Soru\u015fturma ve 2014\/1959 \u0130ddianame say\u0131l\u0131 iddianamelerinde yinelenmi\u015f ve sonu\u00e7 olarak s\u00f6z konusu tutanakta kollu\u011fun belirledi\u011fi s\u0131ralamadaki ilk be\u015f ki\u015fi \u201csu\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131 ile \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131 ile kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f\u2019un verdi\u011fi yakalama ve ek g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 30. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/136 D. \u0130\u015f Karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu \u00f6zellikle vurgulamak isteriz.<\/em><\/p>\n

Tututuklanma talebiyle sevk edilen \u0130stanbul 38. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nce 2013\/56 Sorgu No\u2019lu dosyas\u0131ndan \u201csu\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren somut olgular\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 savc\u0131l\u0131k makam\u0131 itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Fakat bu tiraz da reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 34. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi Hakimi \u0130slam \u00c7i\u00e7ek\u2019in imzas\u0131 ile verdi\u011fi \u0130stanbul C. Savc\u0131s\u0131 H. Nazmi Okumu\u015f 2013\/96961 nolu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda talep edilen arama ve el koyma talebini \u201cdelilerin toplanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle 09.07.2013 tarihli karar\u0131 ile kabul etmi\u015ftir. Arama karar\u0131 karar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphelilere isnad edilen su\u00e7 belirtilmemi\u015ftir. Bu arama karar\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 8. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/109 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yap\u0131lan haks\u0131z arama sonucu elde edilen materyallerin iadesi i\u00e7in 12.07.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019nde \u00fcst aramas\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan e\u015fyalar\u0131 iade etmeyecekleri bildirilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin Hakimi Mustafa Tok\u2019un imzas\u0131 ile 2013\/430 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda iken al\u0131nan karar sonucu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerinde \u00e7\u0131kan materyaller i\u00e7in verilmi\u015f arama, el koyma ve inceleme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stanbul 35. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2013\/430 D. \u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile verilen bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz sonucu \u0130stanbul 7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 2013\/860 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile \u00fcst aramaya ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi gibi;\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, g\u00f6stericilerin \u015fiddet olaylar\u0131na giri\u015fmedikleri durumlarda \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 11 inci maddesi ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan toplant\u0131 yapma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc amac\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmayacaksa yetkililerin toplant\u0131lara belirli bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde tolerans g\u00f6stermeleri gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. (Nurettin Aldemir ve di\u011ferleri v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcne dokunulmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6zellikle de g\u00f6steride bulunanlar\u0131n g\u00fcnl\u00fck ya\u015fam\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na dair her t\u00fcrden engellemenin hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda gerek\u00e7e olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 dahi kabul edilemez bulmaktad\u0131r. (Sergei Kuznetsov v. Rusya)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak kamu idaresi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde \u201cho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi, kanun d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir durumun toplant\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmesini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fini dahi hat\u0131rlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6zellikle vurgulamak isteriz. (Cisse v. Fransa \/ Oya Ataman v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6tesi, \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi kamu idaresinin yaln\u0131zca bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumakla de\u011fil ayn\u0131 zamanda bu hakka dolayl\u0131 olarak usuls\u00fcz s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar getirilmesinden ka\u00e7\u0131nmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olduklar\u0131n\u0131; \u00f6te yandan \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 11 inci maddesinin esasen bireyi, g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken kamu g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin keyfi m\u00fcdahalelerine kar\u015f\u0131 korumay\u0131 hedefledi\u011fini, \u00fcstelik bu haklar\u0131n etkin bir bi\u00e7imde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak amac\u0131 ile pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler de do\u011furabilece\u011fini belirtmektedir. (Djavit An v. T\u00fcrkiye \/ G\u00fcn ve di\u011ferleri v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Mahkemenin i\u00e7tihad\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n dahi adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi ortad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n ceza hukuku temel ilkeleri do\u011frultusunda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi gereklili\u011fi ortadad\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda yetkililer, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve \u015feffaf hareket etmemi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili bir bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan temel prensiplerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere dayanaktan yoksun, kanunsuz ve alelacele soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclemez yahut soru\u015fturma yapma gereklili\u011fi olan, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde bu g\u00f6rev savsaklanamaz. (Zelilof v. Yunanistan) Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar kapsam\u0131nda delillerin hukuka uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dahi kesin olmamaktad\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu konudaki yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda delilerin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve hukuka uygunlu\u011funun sa\u011flanabilmesi i\u00e7in kanunun \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kurallar hi\u00e7 bir istisna olmaks\u0131z\u0131n eksiksiz yerine getirilmelidir ve aksi a\u00e7\u0131k bir ihlal te\u015fkil eder. (Tanr\u0131kulu v. T\u00fcrkiye, ve G\u00fcl v. T\u00fcrkiye)<\/em><\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu soru\u015fturma ve an\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n t\u00fcm kapsam\u0131n\u0131n da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koydu\u011fu \u00fczere olayda 2911 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 28\/1 inci maddesinin unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kken; Taksim Gezisi\u2019ne do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken hi\u00e7 bir uyar\u0131 dahi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, \u015fiddet kullan\u0131larak g\u00f6z alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131plak arama, tuvalete \u00e7\u0131karmama, giysi, ila\u00e7 vermeme gibi uygulamalar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren ve sonras\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131, su\u00e7 niteli\u011findeki soru\u015fturma usulleri uygulayan, bunun sonucunda 08.07.2013 saat 22:00\u2032de d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi belirtilen Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 11.07.2013 g\u00fcn ve 47909374.16769.(12256).2013\/Su\u00e7 No:255 say\u0131l\u0131 \u201cOlaylar\u0131n Kronolojik A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 metni d\u00fczenleyen ve an\u0131lan dosya kapsam\u0131nda mevcut di\u011fer belgeleri haz\u0131rlayan kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak eylemlerine uyan T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunun 86, 94, 96, 109, 113, 120, 134,135 ve 267 inci maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmek zorunlu olmu\u015ftur.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Kaynak: Sendika.Org<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Taksim Dayan\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bug\u00fcn \u00c7a\u011flayan Adliyesi\u2019nde bir bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yaparak Dayan\u0131\u015fma ile ilgili…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":40571,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4703],"tags":[1628,1564],"class_list":{"0":"post-9504","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-kent-ve-doga","8":"tag-taksim-dayanisma","9":"tag-taksim-dayanismasi"},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9504\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eonmeet.com\/pol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}